Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-10
review-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-10-artart-lc-paine-2022-05-09-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 16)
Type Last Call Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2022-05-13
Requested 2022-04-28
Authors Ketan Talaulikar , Peter Psenak , Jeff Tantsura
I-D last updated 2022-05-09
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Andy Smith (diff)
Secdir Early review of -05 by Paul Wouters (diff)
Opsdir Early review of -04 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Himanshu C. Shah (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Russ Housley (diff)
Artart Last Call review of -10 by Kirsty Paine (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Kirsty Paine
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr by ART Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/Gp7TtdCUrbmf6WJy4ATcmN_DYQI
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 16)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-05-09
review-ietf-idr-bgp-ls-app-specific-attr-10-artart-lc-paine-2022-05-09-00
This draft is clear, well-written and I find only one minor issue as follows:
- Abstract: It takes a while until the abstract tells me what the document does
and it doesn't cover the full scope of what it documents. I would move the last
sentence to the start, and then explain the backstory/specifics if it's still
needed, and include the information in the last paragraph of Section 1. This
will help interested readers find your draft and its relevance to them more
quickly.