Last Call Review of draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis-06
review-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis-06-secdir-lc-mandelberg-2020-10-08-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2020-07-14 | |
Requested | 2020-06-29 | |
Authors | Job Snijders , Jakob Heitz , John Scudder , Alexander Azimov | |
I-D last updated | 2020-10-08 | |
Completed reviews |
Opsdir Early review of -04
by Dan Romascanu
(diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Christian Hopps (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -06 by David Mandelberg (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Dan Romascanu (diff) Genart Last Call review of -06 by Dale R. Worley (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | David Mandelberg |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/UMo8NZ7rakrBNN7zCQI38dKM3zo | |
Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 08) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2020-10-08 |
review-ietf-idr-rfc8203bis-06-secdir-lc-mandelberg-2020-10-08-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready. The document seems pretty straightforward from a security perspective, and the Security Considerations section looks good.