Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-03
review-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-03-genart-lc-halpern-2017-03-02-00

Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Title Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-03
Request Last Call - requested 2017-02-27
Reviewer Joel Halpern
Review result Ready with Nits
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/TQBEvp7fWWZQ1qPcdygt81bvx64
Last updated 2017-03-02

Review
review-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-03-genart-lc-halpern-2017-03-02

I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-time-format-??
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2017-03-02
IETF LC End Date: 2017-03-15
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:

Major issues:

Minor issues:
    The wording of the behavioral requirements for signaling in section 2.1 is atypical for IETF documents (and in my view makes it harder for the reader to follow.)  The rules are listed as separate rules, but they are actually sequential steps that must be test in order, exiting the process if the condition for each step is met.  But it does not actually say that.  

Nits/editorial comments: 
    Section 2.3 refers to this as a proposal.  It is a specification, not a proposal.  Please reword.