Last Call Review of draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms-07
review-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms-07-genart-lc-gurbani-2025-03-07-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2025-03-07 | |
| Requested | 2025-02-21 | |
| Authors | Michael B. Jones , Orie Steele | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-05-13 (Latest revision 2025-05-11) | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -08
by Kathleen Moriarty
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff) Artart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Jiankang Yao (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Vijay K. Gurbani |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/hzXJKMeyaAFnEnF10svTJBSa95g | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2025-03-07 |
review-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms-07-genart-lc-gurbani-2025-03-07-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-jose-fully-specified-algorithms-07 Reviewer: Vijay K. Gurbani Review Date: 2025-03-07 IETF LC End Date: 2025-03-07 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: This I-D is ready to be published as a standards document. Major issues: 0 Minor issues: 0 Nits/editorial comments: 2 (please see below) Nits/editorial comments: 1. Some of the wording is colloquial, for instance the following sentence in Section 1: "For instance, with EdDSA, you do not know which of the curves Ed25519 and/or Ed448 are supported!" I do not know whether such colloquialism is intentional, but if not, then the sentence can be re-worded as "For instance, with EdDSA, it is not known which of the curves Ed25519 and/or Ed448 are supported." 2. Section 1: s/It furthermore deprecates/It further deprecates/ (or Furthermore, it deprecates)