Last Call Review of draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05
review-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05-opsdir-lc-banks-2015-06-30-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2015-06-11
Requested 2015-06-08
Authors Michael B. Jones , Nat Sakimura
I-D last updated 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2015-07-09)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -05 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -06 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Adam W. Montville (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Sarah Banks (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Sarah Banks
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint by Ops Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready
Completed 2015-06-30
review-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05-opsdir-lc-banks-2015-06-30-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written with the intent of improving the operational
aspects of the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be
included in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and
WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call
comments.

Document reviewed:  draft-ietf-jose-jwk-thumbprint-05

Summary: Ready to go, no nits, 5 comments (see tools).

Overall, if I were implementing this in code, I'd appreciate the preamble,
thanks for the clear description. I also appreciate that the security section
was well considered and discussed. I have no major comments, other than that it
read like .. an algorithm to me, and I was a bit surprised to see it on the
Standards track, rather than informational, but that's just a comment, not a
nit or problem. The draft is ready to go.

Thanks
Sarah