Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-05
review-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-05-secdir-lc-turner-2023-07-13-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 07)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2023-07-11
Requested 2023-06-27
Authors Corey Bonnell
I-D last updated 2023-10-13 (Latest revision 2023-08-10)
Completed reviews Dnsdir Telechat review of -07 by Tim Wicinski
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -04 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Sean Turner (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Tim Chown (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -04 by John R. Levine (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -04 by Christer Holmberg (diff)
Dnsdir Telechat review of -06 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Sean Turner
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/hpt1no_00FIEjtHme_qZuW-GrDM
Reviewed revision 05 (document currently at 07)
Result Ready
Completed 2023-07-13
review-ietf-lamps-caa-issuemail-05-secdir-lc-turner-2023-07-13-00
I could only found nits in this I-D that shouldn't hold it from progressing:

0) Nits checker complains about the following line being to long in s5.3:

mail.client.example         CAA 0 issuemail "authority.example; account=123456"

can you do this:

mail.client.example
                CAA 0 issuemail "authority.example; account=123456"

Link breaks added for formatting purposes.

1) s/must not/MUST NOT in s6:

OLD:

If a Certification Authority does not
understand the Property, then it must not issue the certificate in
question.

NEW:

If a Certification Authority does not
understand the Property, then it MUST NOT issue the certificate in
question.