Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lamps-pkcs12-pbmac1-07
review-ietf-lamps-pkcs12-pbmac1-07-genart-lc-even-2024-02-14-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-lamps-pkcs12-pbmac1 |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2024-02-22 | |
Requested | 2024-02-08 | |
Authors | Alicja Kario | |
I-D last updated | 2024-02-14 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -07
by Roni Even
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Gyan Mishra (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Roni Even |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-lamps-pkcs12-pbmac1 by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/YzUb9OiYgGwJEAPmGpmQ9Ksn-Xw | |
Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Ready w/nits | |
Completed | 2024-02-14 |
review-ietf-lamps-pkcs12-pbmac1-07-genart-lc-even-2024-02-14-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments just like any other last call comments. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>. Document: draft-ietf-lamps-pkcs12-pbmac1-?? Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date: 2024-02-13 IETF LC End Date: 2024-02-22 IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat Summary: The document is ready for publication as an informational RFC with nits Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: 1. Section 3 if needed should include the reference to RC8174 as in the following text: “The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.” 2. In appendix B you should have a note to the RFC editor to relocate the TBD value with the value assigned by IANA