Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08
review-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08-genart-lc-korhonen-2024-07-04-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 17)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2024-07-05
Requested 2024-06-21
Authors Dino Farinacci , Luigi Iannone
I-D last updated 2025-02-05 (Latest revision 2024-12-09)
Completed reviews Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -08 by Acee Lindem (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -08 by Rich Salz (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -00 by Christian Hopps (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -08 by Jouni Korhonen (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -09 by Timothy Winters (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Jouni Korhonen
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/gaD_eJm19oeZRsJ5oe_tqQJnfRo
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 17)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-07-04
review-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-08-genart-lc-korhonen-2024-07-04-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-lisp-name-encoding-??
Reviewer: Jouni Korhonen
Review Date: 2024-07-04
IETF LC End Date: 2024-07-05
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The document is ready for publication with minor nits-

Major issues: None

Minor issues:
1) Section 7 Security Considerations is a bit thin.. aren't there anything a
rogue host could do?

Nits/editorial comments:
1) Some acronyms (ETR and 'x'TR) are not expanded. Please expand on the first
use. I assume xTR refers ITR and ETR. 2) line 280: s/eTR/ETR