Last Call Review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-04
review-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-04-genart-lc-even-2021-04-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 12)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2021-04-03
Requested 2021-03-20
Requested by Mohit Sethi
Authors Daniel Migault , Tobias Guggemos
I-D last updated 2021-04-02
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -03 by David Mandelberg (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -04 by Roni Even (diff)
Iotdir Last Call review of -03 by Nancy Cam-Winget (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by David Mandelberg (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -06 by Bob Briscoe (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/W3R6WdPRLgAuvMIJYWnld5uaCmU
Reviewed revision 04 (document currently at 12)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2021-04-02
review-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-04-genart-lc-even-2021-04-02-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-??
Reviewer: Roni Even
Review Date: 2021-04-02
IETF LC End Date: None
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
This is an early review of the draft. I find the 04 version easy to understand
but have one comment

Major issues:

Minor issues:
the last paragraph in the abstract , mostly the last sentence " RFC 4303
remains the authoritative description." should be in my opinion in the main
body of the document and not only in the abstract. I also see some difference
between the document and RFC4303

Nits/editorial comments: