IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-06
review-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-06-secdir-lc-ounsworth-2026-03-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2026-04-08
Requested 2026-03-25
Authors Yisong Liu , Changwang Lin , Zheng Zhang , Xuesong Geng , Vinod Kumar Nagaraj
I-D last updated 2026-05-08 (Latest revision 2026-04-17)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -04 by Robert Wills (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Michael P (diff)
Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -06 by Robert Wills (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Behcet Sarikaya (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Mike Ounsworth (diff)
Dnsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by David Blacka (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Mike Ounsworth
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-mboned-amt-yang by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/TOyrjfwpXsBJP_9hhKNm3Jhr70o
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2026-03-27
review-ietf-mboned-amt-yang-06-secdir-lc-ounsworth-2026-03-27-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Ready.

I am not a YANG expert and so I am in no position to judge if the Security
Considerations section adequately covers the content, but it does seem to
fulfill the template given in RFC9907. I'll mark this READY, and if the Chairs
/ AD feel that this deserves a deeper review, then it should be re-assigned to
a SecDir reviewer with more YANG experience.