Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-modern-problem-framework-03
review-ietf-modern-problem-framework-03-genart-lc-halpern-2018-02-06-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-modern-problem-framework
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 04)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2018-02-15
Requested 2018-02-01
Authors Jon Peterson , Tom McGarry
I-D last updated 2018-02-06
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -03 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -03 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Yoav Nir (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joel M. Halpern
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-modern-problem-framework by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 03 (document currently at 04)
Result Ready
Completed 2018-02-06
review-ietf-modern-problem-framework-03-genart-lc-halpern-2018-02-06-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-modern-problem-framework-03
Reviewer: Joel Halpern
Review Date: 2018-02-06
IETF LC End Date: 2018-02-15
IESG Telechat date: 2018-02-22

Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC.

Major issues:

Minor issues:
    I presume that the lack of description on how to apply controls to
    semi-restricted or restricted data, particulalry in the distributed data
    store case, is deliberate?  I presume that the WG intent is that this is a
    topic to be dealt with in the solutions, not the problem statement and
    framework?  Things are fine if that is the intent.  If the WG views this as
    an actual useful description of how to handle those aspects, then I would
    ask for more descriptions.

Nits/editorial comments:
     Editorial: In the definition of Credential Authority the text uses the
     phrase "one of more" when I am pretty sure the intent is "one or more".