IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid-05
review-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid-05-secdir-lc-geater-2025-04-25-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-04-21 | |
| Requested | 2025-04-07 | |
| Requested by | Jim Guichard | |
| Authors | Xiao Min , Shaofu Peng , Liyan Gong , Rakesh Gandhi , Carlos Pignataro | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-10-29 (Latest revision 2025-06-06) | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -01
by Ben Niven-Jenkins
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Jon Geater (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Bing Liu (diff) Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Andy Smith (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Jon Geater |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/rhXGUFPmRKBRwy8irKzbFIN8X8M | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2025-04-25 |
review-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid-05-secdir-lc-geater-2025-04-25-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. In a largely positive review of draft-04 I found one issue with clarity and references which was quickly addressed by the authors in a new draft-05. I wish to thank the authors for their quick and friendly turn around of the review comments and am satisfied that draft-05 contains appropriate treatment of security concerns.