IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid-06
review-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid-06-opsdir-lc-liu-2025-04-30-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-04-21 | |
| Requested | 2025-04-07 | |
| Requested by | Jim Guichard | |
| Authors | Xiao Min , Shaofu Peng , Liyan Gong , Rakesh Gandhi , Carlos Pignataro | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-10-29 (Latest revision 2025-06-06) | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -01
by Ben Niven-Jenkins
(diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Jon Geater (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -06 by Bing Liu (diff) Rtgdir IETF Last Call review of -12 by Andy Smith (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Bing Liu |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/eNIZnUr6m6pUMLW_5yfS9oV9eCw | |
| Reviewed revision | 06 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2025-04-30 |
review-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid-06-opsdir-lc-liu-2025-04-30-00
Hi Dear author, I'm assigned to review draft-ietf-mpls-spring-lsp-ping-path-sid-06 by OPSDir. General status: Has Nits This document is a concrete proposal of defining PSID FEC sub TLVs for LSP Ping. The content and node behavior of the sub-TLVs is well specified in details. No problems found in tehchnical perspective. The Nit: I've been a bit confusing of what is the usage of the newly defined TLVs when firstly read the draft. Then I found it might be mainly for verification of the conformance between the control plane and the data plane for a given FEC, based on some texts "hidden" in the sub-TLV definition section. (And yet, not very sure whether there might be other usage.) I'd suggest to add some background/scenarios description in Section 1 and also summarize it in the abstract. I believe it would be very helpful to navigate the readers who don't know the bachground of this work. B.R. Bing