Telechat Review of draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19
review-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19-rtgdir-telechat-bhatia-2018-07-17-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 21)
Type Telechat Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2018-07-13
Requested 2018-06-27
Requested by Alvaro Retana
Authors Mahesh Jethanandani , Sonal Agarwal , Lisa Huang , Dana Blair
I-D last updated 2018-07-17
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -07 by Mahesh Jethanandani (diff)
Rtgdir Telechat review of -19 by Manav Bhatia (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -19 by Steve Hanna (diff)
Tsvart Last Call review of -19 by Allison Mankin (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -19 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -19 by Joe Clarke (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Manav Bhatia
State Completed
Request Telechat review on draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 19 (document currently at 21)
Result Ready
Completed 2018-07-17
review-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19-rtgdir-telechat-bhatia-2018-07-17-00
Hello,

I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft.
The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related
drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes
on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to
the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please
see ​http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir

Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it
would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last
Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through
discussion or by updating the draft.

Document: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-19
Reviewer: Manav Bhatia
Review Date: 17 July 2018
IETF LC End Date: date-if-known
Intended Status: Informational

Summary:
No issues found. This document is ready for publication.

Comments:

I have never worked on YANG  and yet found the document quite
readable, and explanations
clear and concise.

Major Issues:
No major issues found.

Minor Issues:
No minor issues found.

Cheers, Manav