IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-17
review-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-17-genart-lc-enghardt-2025-10-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2025-10-14
Requested 2025-09-30
Authors Robert Wilton , Scott Mansfield
I-D last updated 2025-10-19 (Latest revision 2025-10-19)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -04 by Andy Bierman (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -16 by Andy Bierman (diff)
Intdir IETF Last Call review of -17 by Satoru Matsushima (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -17 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -17 by Michael Scharf (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -17 by Reese Enghardt (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Reese Enghardt
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/VTPcHV1_-MHufUPNDkgtadCJRD8
Reviewed revision 17 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2025-10-10
review-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-17-genart-lc-enghardt-2025-10-10-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://wiki.ietf.org/en/group/gen/GenArtFAQ>.

Document: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-17
Reviewer: Reese Enghardt
Review Date: 2025-10-10
IETF LC End Date: 2025-10-14
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary: The draft is clear and concise, and is ready for publication as
Proposed Standard.

Major issues: None.

Minor issues:

Section 9 (Security Considerations) has RFC AAAA, but I don't see where that
reference is defined. Please double-check that this reference is clear.

Nits/editorial comments:

Are Sections 2 and 3 the high level descriptions and Sections 4 and 5 the
formal specifications? The headings are not clear about this, as the difference
between them is "Module" VS "YANG module". Please consider changing the
headings to make the structure of the document clearer.

In Section 9, if there are no particularly sensitive nodes, does this text need
to be included at all?