IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-17
review-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-17-opsdir-lc-jiang-2025-10-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2025-10-11
Requested 2025-09-22
Requested by Mahesh Jethanandani
Authors Robert Wilton , Scott Mansfield
I-D last updated 2025-10-19 (Latest revision 2025-10-19)
Completed reviews Yangdoctors Early review of -04 by Andy Bierman (diff)
Yangdoctors Early review of -16 by Andy Bierman (diff)
Intdir IETF Last Call review of -17 by Satoru Matsushima (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -17 by Sheng Jiang (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -17 by Michael Scharf (diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -17 by Reese Enghardt (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Sheng Jiang
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/0YZne6xy4kkagMNe5duGkReonzU
Reviewed revision 17 (document currently at 18)
Result Has nits
Completed 2025-10-11
review-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-17-opsdir-lc-jiang-2025-10-11-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the OPS directorate's ongoing effort
to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. Comments that are not
addressed in last call may be included in AD reviews during the IESG review.
Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other
last call comments.

Document: draft-ietf-netmod-intf-ext-yang-17
Reviewer: Sheng Jiang
Review Date: 2025-10-12
Result: Has Nits

This standard track document This document defines two YANG modules that
augment the Interfaces data model defined in the "YANG Data Model for Interface
Management". It is well-written. I have only found a couple of Nits:

There are a few acronyms terms has no explanation. They should be expanded when
they first appear. Section 9 has an open quate [RFCAAAA], which should be
replaced by an real RFC number.