Telechat Review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08
review-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08-rtgdir-telechat-jia-2018-01-16-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2018-01-23 | |
Requested | 2018-01-05 | |
Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
Authors | Ladislav Lhotka , Acee Lindem , Yingzhen Qu | |
I-D last updated | 2018-01-16 | |
Completed reviews |
Yangdoctors Early review of -05
by Martin Björklund
(diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Carl Wallace (diff) Genart Telechat review of -06 by Francis Dupont (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -07 by Joe Clarke (diff) Rtgdir Telechat review of -08 by He Jia (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | He Jia |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 11) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2018-01-16 |
review-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08-rtgdir-telechat-jia-2018-01-16-00
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-08.txt Reviewer: Jia He Review Date: 17 January 2018 IETF LC End Date: 15 January 2018 Telechat date: 25 January 2018 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary This document provides an NMDA-compliant version of YANG data model for routing management. It is very well written and ready for publication. But I happened to see a small nit in Appendix D just before I finished my review, see below. Comments None. Major Issues: No major issues found. Minor Issues: No minor issues found. Nits: In Appendix D, the namespace of "ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing" is written as "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-ipv6-unicast-routing-3". "-3" is not meaningful and needs to be deleted. Regards, Jia