Early Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-10
review-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-10-genart-early-kyzivat-2024-08-27-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-10
Requested revision 10 (document currently at 13)
Type Early Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2024-09-09
Requested 2024-08-09
Requested by Matthew Bocci
Authors Greg Mirsky , Sami Boutros , David L. Black , Santosh Pallagatti
I-D last updated 2024-08-27
Completed reviews Rtgdir Early review of -04 by Himanshu C. Shah (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -11 by Stig Venaas (diff)
Genart Early review of -10 by Paul Kyzivat (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Paul Kyzivat
State Completed
Request Early review on draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/2HZhctR1z1bfGVKg8GTatrfn0ZY
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 13)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2024-08-27
review-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-10-genart-early-kyzivat-2024-08-27-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft.
For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-10
Reviewer: Paul Kyzivat
Review Date: 2024-08-27
IETF LC End Date: TBD
IESG Telechat date: TBD

Summary:

This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should 
be fixed before publication.

NIT:

Section 1.1.1 includes the following statement:

"The term "BIER OAM" used in this document interchangeably with longer 
version "set of OAM protocols, methods, and tools for BIER layer"."

But BIER is not used anywhere else in the document. Hence I think you 
can remove this. If you choose to retain it, then it needs to be defined.

Otherwise this document seems ready to go.