Telechat Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-13
review-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-13-opsdir-telechat-li-2025-01-02-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 16) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2025-01-07 | |
| Requested | 2024-12-17 | |
| Authors | Greg Mirsky , Sami Boutros , David L. Black , Santosh Pallagatti | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-05-31 (Latest revision 2025-02-26) | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -04
by Himanshu Shah
(diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -11 by Stig Venaas (diff) Genart Early review of -10 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by Yoav Nir (diff) Intdir IETF Last Call review of -14 by Tim Chown (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -13 by Tony Li (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Tony Li |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/TnB-VxpB8XJkqTDhfnUA25LA4cw | |
| Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 16) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2025-01-02 |
review-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-13-opsdir-telechat-li-2025-01-02-00
OPSDIR Review of draft-ietf-nvo3-geneve-oam-13 Reviewer: Tony Li Status: Disclaimer: I am NOT a fan of Geneve and I will not attempt to hide my disaffection for the underlying technoloyg. That said, I will try to review this document on its own merits. Overall: Ready, with nits I found the document to be clear, concise and informative. It accomplishes its goals. I found that the document left me wanting more: if there is a connectivity problem within a VNI and a ping fails, then how do I track down and isolate the fault? Ok, yes, this is beyond the scope of the document, but it is somewhat cruel to leave the reader hanging. Section 2.2 sets up two scenarios but then never resolves them. Did Alfred Hitchcock contribute? Details: Section 2.1: Requirement 5 is a bit unclear. What do you mean by 'express entropy'? I think you mean something like: "There must be a way to encode entopy information into the underlay forwarding scheme so that OAM packets take the same dataflow paths as the transit traffic flows Section 2.2.1: Nit: s/) ,/),/