Last Call Review of draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21
review-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21-opsdir-lc-taylor-2014-09-29-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 23) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2014-09-29 | |
| Requested | 2014-09-19 | |
| Authors | Brian Campbell , Chuck Mortimore , Michael B. Jones | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2014-11-12) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -21
by Meral Shirazipour
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -21 by Meral Shirazipour (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -21 by Vincent Roca (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -21 by Tom Taylor (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Tom Taylor |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 21 (document currently at 23) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2014-09-29 |
review-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-21-opsdir-lc-taylor-2014-09-29-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Tom Taylor Summary: Process issue: IDnits complains of a normative reference to Informational document RFC 6755. This was NOT noted in the Last Call announcement (but was noted in the Shepherd writeup). No operational issue identified beyond what is already covered by the Interoperability Considerations section. Editorial Nits: S2.2: The paragraph before the actual example uses terminology inconsistent with RFC 6749: s/authorization code grant/authorization grant/