IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-10
review-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-10-artart-lc-reschke-2025-06-11-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team ART Area Review Team (artart)
Deadline 2025-06-20
Requested 2025-06-09
Requested by Mahesh Jethanandani
Authors Guy Harris , Michael Richardson
I-D last updated 2026-04-15 (Latest revision 2026-04-06)
Completed reviews Genart IETF Last Call review of -04 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Intdir IETF Last Call review of -05 by Carlos J. Bernardos (diff)
Artart IETF Last Call review of -10 by Julian Reschke (diff)
Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -10 by Michael Scharf (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Luis M. Contreras (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -13 by Tirumaleswar Reddy.K (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Julian Reschke
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype by ART Area Review Team Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/vvNXtopxCuE3_XRil46MhsVs-X8
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2025-06-11
review-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-10-artart-lc-reschke-2025-06-11-00
This document is ready with microscopic nits.

Note that I only reviewed based on my IANA registry Knowledge, not PCAP etc.

Here are the nits:

1)
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-10.html#section-2.2.1
might be better as a table, or at least with some more structure between the
items. But I'll assume IANA does not care?

2) In
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype-10.html#section-2.2.1:

s/Tuexen/Tüxen/