Skip to main content

IETF Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl-11
review-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl-11-opsdir-lc-dhody-2026-01-26-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type IETF Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2026-01-26
Requested 2026-01-12
Requested by Mahesh Jethanandani
Authors Qiufang Ma , Qin Wu , Mohamed Boucadair , Daniel King
I-D last updated 2026-04-06 (Latest revision 2026-04-01)
Completed reviews Opsdir Early review of -08 by Dhruv Dhody (diff)
Intdir Early review of -10 by Alexander Pelov (diff)
Secdir IETF Last Call review of -11 by Valery Smyslov (diff)
Yangdoctors IETF Last Call review of -12 by Acee Lindem (diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -11 by Dhruv Dhody (diff)
Comments
The YANG Doctors and the OPSDIR review have provided an Early Review, so this change should be a quick check. The rest of the review requests are new.
Assignment Reviewer Dhruv Dhody
State Completed
Request IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl by Ops Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/VIMNxme-Rf299RS6eXc2xnr9c7k
Reviewed revision 11 (document currently at 15)
Result Has nits
Completed 2026-01-26
review-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl-11-opsdir-lc-dhody-2026-01-26-00
Hi,

I have been selected as the Operational Directorate (opsdir) reviewer for this
Internet-Draft. I did an early review on -08 -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/review-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl-08-opsdir-early-dhody-2025-10-06/;
I have verified the diff.

The Operational Directorate reviews all operational and management-related
Internet-Drafts to ensure alignment with operational best practices and that
adequate operational considerations are covered.

A complete set of _"Guidelines for Considering Operations and Management in
IETF Specifications"_ can be found at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-rfc5706bis/.

While these comments are primarily for the Operations and Management Area
Directors (Ops ADs), the authors should consider them alongside other feedback
received.

- Document: draft-ietf-opsawg-ucl-acl-11

- Reviewer: Dhruv Dhody

- Review Date: 2026-01-26

- Intended Status: Standards Track

---

## Summary

Choose one:

- Has Nits: This document is basically ready for publication but has nits that
should be considered prior to publication.

## General Operational Comments Alignment with RFC 5706bis

The draft includes an Operational Considerations with key focus areas which
seems acceptable for this document.

## Major Issues

No major issues found.

## Minor Issues

No Minor issues found.

## Nits

- Section 2, formatting issue with device group and Application group.

Thanks!
Dhruv