Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-21
review-ietf-opsec-v6-21-secdir-lc-dunbar-2019-12-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 27)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-12-02
Requested 2019-11-11
Authors Éric Vyncke , KK Chittimaneni , Merike Kaeo , Enno Rey
Draft last updated 2019-12-02
Completed reviews Opsdir Early review of -13 by Tim Chown (diff)
Iotdir Early review of -21 by Ted Lemon (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -21 by Acee Lindem (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -21 by Tim Chown (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -21 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -21 by Erik Kline (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -25 by Tim Chown (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -24 by Acee Lindem (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -26 by Tim Chown (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Review review-ietf-opsec-v6-21-secdir-lc-dunbar-2019-12-02
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/jVtE996GjtFwpZGudTVTjCTLDJU
Reviewed revision 21 (document currently at 27)
Result Ready
Completed 2019-12-02
review-ietf-opsec-v6-21-secdir-lc-dunbar-2019-12-02-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

This document is really good, it summarizes  the IPv6 security issues from
multiple RFCs. I think IETF should do more of this kind of summary documents
that collect high lights from multiple RFCs, to make it easier for network
operators.

Linda Dunbar