Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd-15
review-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd-15-rtgdir-lc-mizrahi-2018-08-20-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 25) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2018-08-29 | |
Requested | 2018-08-15 | |
Requested by | Alvaro Retana | |
Authors | Jeff Tantsura , Uma Chunduri , Sam Aldrin , Peter Psenak | |
I-D last updated | 2018-08-20 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -10
by Tal Mizrahi
(diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -15 by Tal Mizrahi (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -18 by Vincent Roca (diff) Genart Last Call review of -17 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) Genart Telechat review of -20 by Paul Kyzivat (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Tal Mizrahi |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 15 (document currently at 25) | |
Result | Has issues | |
Completed | 2018-08-20 |
review-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd-15-rtgdir-lc-mizrahi-2018-08-20-00
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-msd Reviewer: Tal Mizrahi Review Date: 21-Aug-2018 Intended Status: Standards Track *Summary:* This document is basically ready for publication, but has a couple of minor issues and nits that should be resolved prior to publication. *Minor Issues:* - Figure 1 seems to indicate that the MSD-Type and the MSD-Value are 2 octets long each, whereas according to the text afterwards each of the two fields is 1 octet long. - Figure 2 – same comment. *Nits:* - “provisioned..” --> “provisioned.” (extra period) - “Acknowledgements” --> “Acknowledgments” - “capabilites” --> “capabilities” - “the the” --> “the” Cheers, Tal.