Last Call Review of draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08
review-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08-secdir-lc-gudmundsson-2015-01-08-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 11) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2015-01-06 | |
| Requested | 2014-12-11 | |
| Authors | Spencer Giacalone , David Ward , John Drake , Alia Atlas , Stefano Previdi | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-01-08 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Telechat review of -09
by Martin Thomson
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Ólafur Guðmundsson (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Menachem Dodge (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Ólafur Guðmundsson |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 11) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2015-01-08 |
review-ietf-ospf-te-metric-extensions-08-secdir-lc-gudmundsson-2015-01-08-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. This document is Ready with nits. The document contains no issues from a security perspective as it is only creating LSA’s for new types of route selection metrics, time instead of network hops. The Nit that I have is the document in introduction says time is important and the ability to select faster path has high economical gain. The base time measurement unit in the new LSA’s is MICRO seconds, there is no justification in the document that says 1 micro second is granular enough for links of the near future (over 100 Gbits+). Olafur