Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-08
review-ietf-pce-pcep-color-08-tsvart-lc-black-2025-01-31-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 12) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | Transport Area Review Team (tsvart) | |
| Deadline | 2025-02-07 | |
| Requested | 2025-01-24 | |
| Authors | Balaji Rajagopalan , Vishnu Pavan Beeram , Shaofu Peng , Mike Koldychev , Gyan Mishra | |
| I-D last updated | 2025-10-29 (Latest revision 2025-02-26) | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -04
by Ron Bonica
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -11 by Christer Holmberg (diff) Tsvart IETF Last Call review of -08 by David L. Black (diff) Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -11 by Adrian Farrel (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | David L. Black |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color by Transport Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tsv-art/Spignp6xMQFSLBlbNhVTSioG3oM | |
| Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 12) | |
| Result | Ready w/nits | |
| Completed | 2025-01-31 |
review-ietf-pce-pcep-color-08-tsvart-lc-black-2025-01-31-00
This document has been reviewed as part of the transport area review team's ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but are copied to the document's authors and WG to allow them to address any issues raised and also to the IETF discussion list for information. When done at the time of IETF Last Call, the authors should consider this review as part of the last-call comments they receive. Please always CC tsv-art@ietf.org if you reply to or forward this review. This is a straightforward document that extends PCEP (Path Computation Element Protocol) to include color elements for TE or SR routing. As a minor extension to PCEP, it does not raise any significant transport- related concerns. I noticed one nit, which is a judgement call. The authors should review whether draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp ought to be a Normative Reference (it's currently informative). This is a judgement call, as that referenced draft specifies functionality that excludes use of the functionality in this draft, hence it is definitely relevant to an implementer of this draft because the referenced draft limits the scope of usability. For clarity, this is a request for review, not a request for change. Both outcomes (reference remains Informative, reference changed to Normative) are acceptable to this reviewer.