Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-08
review-ietf-pcp-proxy-08-opsdir-lc-ersue-2015-07-13-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-pcp-proxy |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Last Call Review | |
Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
Deadline | 2015-07-07 | |
Requested | 2015-06-23 | |
Authors | Simon Perreault , Mohamed Boucadair , Reinaldo Penno , Dan Wing , Stuart Cheshire | |
I-D last updated | 2015-07-13 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -08
by Joel M. Halpern
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Samuel Weiler (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Mehmet Ersue (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Mehmet Ersue |
State | Completed | |
Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-pcp-proxy by Ops Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2015-07-13 |
review-ietf-pcp-proxy-08-opsdir-lc-ersue-2015-07-13-00
I reviewed the document "Port Control Protocol (PCP) Proxy Function" (draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-08.txt) as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. Intended status: Standards Track Current IESG state: IESG Evaluation IANA Review State: IANA OK - No Actions Needed Summary: The document specifies a new PCP functional element denoted as a PCP Proxy. The PCP Proxy relays PCP requests received from PCP clients to upstream PCP server(s). There are no nits in the draft. I don't see any issues from the operations and management pov. Not being an insider I just wonder which MIB or YANG module is used to configure such a PCP proxy? Are we prepared for this? Cheers, Mehmet