Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-08

Request Review of draft-ietf-pcp-proxy
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 09)
Type Last Call Review
Team Ops Directorate (opsdir)
Deadline 2015-07-07
Requested 2015-06-23
Authors Simon Perreault , Mohamed Boucadair , Reinaldo Penno , Dan Wing , Stuart Cheshire
Draft last updated 2015-07-13
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Joel M. Halpern (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Samuel Weiler (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Mehmet Ersue (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Mehmet Ersue
State Completed Snapshot
Review review-ietf-pcp-proxy-08-opsdir-lc-ersue-2015-07-13
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 09)
Result Ready
Completed 2015-07-13

I reviewed the document "Port Control Protocol (PCP) Proxy Function"
(draft-ietf-pcp-proxy-08.txt) as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
comments were written primarily for the benefit of the operational area
directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

Intended status: Standards Track

Current IESG state: IESG Evaluation

IANA Review State: IANA OK - No Actions Needed

Summary: The document specifies a new PCP functional element denoted as a PCP
Proxy. The PCP Proxy relays PCP requests received from PCP clients to upstream
PCP server(s).

There are no nits in the draft.

I don't see any issues from the operations and management pov.

Not being an insider I just wonder which MIB or YANG module is used to
configure such a PCP proxy?

Are we prepared for this?