Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport-33
review-ietf-quic-transport-33-intdir-telechat-volz-2021-01-04-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-quic-transport
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 34)
Type Telechat Review
Team Internet Area Directorate (intdir)
Deadline 2021-01-05
Requested 2020-12-14
Requested by Éric Vyncke
Authors Jana Iyengar , Martin Thomson
Draft last updated 2021-01-04
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -32 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -32 by Ron Bonica (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -33 by Bernie Volz (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -33 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Comments
This is a pretty large document to review... So, no need to look into the details but a high-level review will be appreciated.
See also https://trac.ietf.org/trac/int/wiki/IntAreaIssues

Regards and Seasons Greetings

-éric
Assignment Reviewer Bernie Volz
State Completed
Review review-ietf-quic-transport-33-intdir-telechat-volz-2021-01-04
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/5kUCOs5rx_hV64qicNlgjllb2rg
Reviewed revision 33 (document currently at 34)
Result Ready
Completed 2021-01-04
review-ietf-quic-transport-33-intdir-telechat-volz-2021-01-04-00
I am an assigned INT directorate reviewer for draft-ietf-quic-transport-33.
These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the Internet Area
Directors. Document editors and shepherd(s) should treat these comments just
like they would treat comments from any other IETF contributors and resolve
them along with any other Last Call comments that have been received. For more
details on the INT Directorate, see
https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/intdir/about/.

Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as NO
OBJECTION.

There is a lot here and the document seems well put together and thorough.

I didn’t notice any major or even minor issues with the document – it looks
like it has had lots of careful review to date. (The one minor typo is
“version” is misspelled as “verion” in the “DO NOT DEPLOY THIS VERSION OF QUIC”
text, which will be removed anyway.)

I also reviewed the document for the items listed at
https://trac.ietf.org/trac/int/wiki/IntAreaIssues and the document fully
supports IPv6 (it support both IPv4 and IPv6 equally), deal with MTU and
fragmentation properly, and has no other issues listed at this link.

Therefore, I think this document is ready to advance.

-       Bernie Volz