Last Call Review of draft-ietf-quic-v2-05
review-ietf-quic-v2-05-artart-lc-gruessing-2022-10-09-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-quic-v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | ART Area Review Team (artart) | |
| Deadline | 2022-10-11 | |
| Requested | 2022-09-27 | |
| Authors | Martin Duke | |
| I-D last updated | 2022-10-09 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -05
by Joel M. Halpern
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -05 by Kyle Rose (diff) Artart Last Call review of -05 by James Gruessing (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -05 by Bo Wu (diff) Dnsdir Last Call review of -05 by Vladimír Čunát (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | James Gruessing |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-quic-v2 by ART Area Review Team Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/art/QoxT3FUTyZmtLDZOrKGDj8NWWi0 | |
| Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 10) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2022-10-09 |
review-ietf-quic-v2-05-artart-lc-gruessing-2022-10-09-00
This is my review of draft-ietf-quic-v2-05 as part of ART Last Call review. Overall this is a well written document that is clear in its writing, and I have only one minor point of clarification. Section 4.1 - "The client ignores Retry packets using other versions." - is this supposed to be a normative phrase, i.e. "The client SHOULD/MUST ignore Retry packets"? This sentence feels out of place in a paragraph with normative text defining other requirements. Or is this a behaviour defined in VN that I have missed?