Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest-10
review-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest-10-genart-lc-dunbar-2022-01-19-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 14)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2022-01-19
Requested 2022-01-05
Authors Guy Fedorkow , Eric Voit , Jessica Fitzgerald-McKay
I-D last updated 2022-01-19
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -10 by Shawn M Emery (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Linda Dunbar
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/gen-art/uJfSJiH2jjpTrxAlux60VNEDF-0
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 14)
Result Ready
Completed 2022-01-19
review-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest-10-genart-lc-dunbar-2022-01-19-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at

<https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Document: draft-ietf-rats-tpm-based-network-device-attest-10
Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review Date: 2022-01-19
IETF LC End Date: 2022-01-19
IESG Telechat date: Not scheduled for a telechat

Summary:
This draft is pretty long, describing the workflow for remote attestation of
the integrity of firmware and software installed on network devices that
contain Trusted Platform Modules.

All the description is the procedures are very clear.

Just curious, what if the Trusted Platform Module on the device is compromised?

Major issues:
None

Minor issues:
None.

Nits/editorial comments:

Thank you
Linda Dunbar