Last Call Review of draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-07
review-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-07-secdir-lc-reddyk-2021-02-25-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 08) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2021-02-09 | |
| Requested | 2021-01-26 | |
| Authors | James Gould , Martin Casanova | |
| I-D last updated | 2021-02-25 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -07
by Peter E. Yee
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Tirumaleswar Reddy.K (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Qin Wu (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Tirumaleswar Reddy.K |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/_L3lF90g-ZTLBBM3OvZGuhIlk7k | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 08) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2021-02-21 |
review-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-07-secdir-lc-reddyk-2021-02-25-00
Reviewer: Tirumaleswar Reddy Review result: Has nits This document does not define any new EPP protocol elements, it specifies an operational practice using the existing EPP protocol. It does not discuss any security aspects other than relying on the security considerations in EPP protocol [RFC5730]. The security considerations described in these other specifications apply to this specification as well. Comment> What other specifications are you referring to ? -Tiru