Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-09
review-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-09-secdir-lc-salowey-2019-02-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test
Requested rev. no specific revision (document currently at 10)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2019-02-11
Requested 2019-01-28
Authors Zaheduzzaman Sarker, Varun Singh, Xiaoqing Zhu, Michael Ramalho
Draft last updated 2019-02-10
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Joseph Salowey (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -09 by Stewart Bryant (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Joseph Salowey
State Completed
Review review-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-09-secdir-lc-salowey-2019-02-10
Reviewed rev. 09 (document currently at 10)
Review result Has Issues
Review completed: 2019-02-10

Review
review-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-09-secdir-lc-salowey-2019-02-10

I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's 
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the 
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the 
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat 
these comments just like any other last call comments.

The summary of the review is Document has issues.   I would like to see Stewart Bryant's Genart comments about emphasizing that tests should be conducted in a controlled environment and not the open Internet.