Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-09
review-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-09-secdir-lc-salowey-2019-02-10-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 10) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
| Deadline | 2019-02-11 | |
| Requested | 2019-01-28 | |
| Authors | Zaheduzzaman Sarker , Varun Singh , Xiaoqing Zhu , Michael A. Ramalho | |
| I-D last updated | 2019-02-10 | |
| Completed reviews |
Secdir Last Call review of -09
by Joseph A. Salowey
(diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Stewart Bryant (diff) Genart Telechat review of -09 by Stewart Bryant (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Joseph A. Salowey |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Last Call review on draft-ietf-rmcat-eval-test by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 09 (document currently at 10) | |
| Result | Has issues | |
| Completed | 2019-02-10 |
review-ietf-rmcat-eval-test-09-secdir-lc-salowey-2019-02-10-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Document has issues. I would like to see Stewart Bryant's Genart comments about emphasizing that tests should be conducted in a controlled environment and not the open Internet.