Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10

Request Review of draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 18)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2021-03-31
Requested 2021-03-16
Authors Charles E. Perkins , S.V.R Anand , Satish Anamalamudi , Bing (Remy) Liu
I-D last updated 2021-04-22
Completed reviews Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Tero Kivinen (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -10 by Meral Shirazipour (diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -10 by Tero Kivinen (diff)
Iotdir Telechat review of -10 by Peter Van der Stok (diff)
Rtgdir Last Call review of -16 by Tony Przygienda (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Meral Shirazipour
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Posted at
Reviewed revision 10 (document currently at 18)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2021-04-22
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair.  Please treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

For more information, please see the FAQ at


Document: draft-ietf-roll-aodv-rpl-10
Reviewer: Meral Shirazipour
Review Date: 2021-04-22
IETF LC End Date: 2021-03-31
IESG Telechat date: 2021-04-22

Summary: This draft is almost ready to be published as Standards Track RFC but
I have some comments.

Major issues:

Minor issues:
Other than some issues already reported on the list, the draft is a bit hard to
follow, Intro could be improved and the terminology was very long, maybe
presenting terms in category would help.

Nits/editorial comments:

Section B1 says "Reclassified [RFC6998] and [RFC7416] as Informational."
RFC7416 was already Informational. What that a typo?
This is not part of the final RFC - I was just trying to follow the various
diffs of the document.