Last Call Review of draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-31
review-ietf-roll-dao-projection-31-secdir-lc-wierenga-2023-03-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-31
Requested revision 31 (document currently at 40)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2023-03-14
Requested 2023-01-05
Requested by Ines Robles
Authors Pascal Thubert , Rahul Jadhav , Michael Richardson
I-D last updated 2023-03-05
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -32 by Susan Hares (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -31 by Klaas Wierenga (diff)
Tsvart Telechat review of -36 by Michael Scharf (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -39 by Ran Chen (diff)
Comments 
Hello,

ROLL WG kindly request for a routing directorate review and security directorate review of draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection-31. 

The review deadline is 22 of January. If you need more time please let us know.

Abstract: "This document extends RFC 6550, RFC 6553, and RFC 8138 to enable a RPL Root to install and maintain Projected Routes within its DODAG, along a selected set of nodes that may or may not include itself, for a chosen duration.  This potentially enables routes that are more optimized or resilient than those obtained with the classical distributed operation of RPL, either in terms of the size of a Routing Header or in terms of path length, which impacts both the latency and the packet delivery ratio."

Many thanks,

Ines.
Assignment Reviewer Klaas Wierenga
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-roll-dao-projection by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/PaOtWCbSZp8Z7BHBzqn2saMaXOQ
Reviewed revision 31 (document currently at 40)
Result Ready
Completed 2023-03-05
review-ietf-roll-dao-projection-31-secdir-lc-wierenga-2023-03-05-00
Hi,

I believe the authors adequately described the different attack vectors when
P-DAOs are introduced. The mitigating measures like requiring that only the
root can send P-DAO and validation of VIO seem reasonable.

Klaas