Last Call Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-09
review-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-09-secdir-lc-josefsson-2015-01-02-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2014-12-25
Requested 2014-12-18
Authors Stewart Bryant , Clarence Filsfils , Stefano Previdi , Mike Shand , Ning So
I-D last updated 2015-01-02
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -08 by Suresh Krishnan (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -09 by Suresh Krishnan (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -09 by Simon Josefsson (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Simon Josefsson
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 09 (document currently at 11)
Result Ready
Completed 2015-01-02
review-ietf-rtgwg-remote-lfa-09-secdir-lc-josefsson-2015-01-02-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just
like any other last call comments.

This document describes an extension to a part of RFC5286.  It does not
claim to update RFC 5286 (or any other document) so any security
considerations introduced would only affect implementations of this
document, which is a good sanity check. I did not digest the algorithm
itself enough to analyse any security aspects of it.  The document
title is 'Remote LFA FRR' and I suggest to expand the acronyms, or
consider a more descriptive title.  The document is hard to read for
someone not familiar with the area, but there is a decent Terminology
and Introduction section to smoothen things out.

I believe the document has no issues.

/Simon


Attachment:


pgpEAI13vFRF_.pgp




Description:

 OpenPGP digital signatur