Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-08
review-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-08-rtgdir-lc-venaas-2021-09-29-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Last Call Review
Team Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir)
Deadline 2021-09-30
Requested 2021-09-14
Requested by Martin Vigoureux
Authors Yuehua Wei , Uri Elzur , Sumandra Majee , Carlos Pignataro , Donald E. Eastlake 3rd
I-D last updated 2021-09-29
Completed reviews Rtgdir Last Call review of -08 by Stig Venaas (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -08 by Charlie Kaufman (diff)
Genart Last Call review of -08 by Roni Even (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -08 by Scott O. Bradner (diff)
Intdir Telechat review of -09 by Bob Halley (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Stig Venaas
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv by Routing Area Directorate Assigned
Posted at https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/rtg-dir/727VM2zYXKn-Us60_juXSedGA8o
Reviewed revision 08 (document currently at 15)
Result Has issues
Completed 2021-09-29
review-ietf-sfc-nsh-tlv-08-rtgdir-lc-venaas-2021-09-29-00
Summary:
The document is easy to read and in a good shape.
I have some minor concerns about this document that I think should be resolved
before publication.

Comments:

The document is quite good and easy to read. My only concern is the security
considerations that are rather brief.

Major Issues:

No major issues found.

Minor Issues:

The Security considerations might need more details.
Are there any concerns about incorrect metadata? What are the consequences of
metadata being wrong intentionally, or by accident. When should integrity
protection be used?