Telechat Review of draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-05
review-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-05-secdir-telechat-mandelberg-2021-07-08-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 06) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2021-07-13 | |
Requested | 2021-06-22 | |
Authors | Martin Duke | |
I-D last updated | 2021-07-08 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Gyan Mishra
(diff)
Secdir Telechat review of -05 by David Mandelberg (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | David Mandelberg |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/s_7naHa4wJrobXqI1H8Tdnm0xIU | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 06) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2021-07-01 |
review-ietf-shmoo-cancel-meeting-05-secdir-telechat-mandelberg-2021-07-08-00
I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG chairs should treat these comments just like any other last call comments. The summary of the review is Ready. The only thing I see in the document that looks at all relevant to security is the effect that cancellation (or potentially other options) could have on "the nomination process and seating of new officers." But also, I doubt that anybody would create an emergency on the scale this document talks about just to affect nomination or seating.