Last Call Review of draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04
review-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04-genart-lc-krishnan-2013-12-03-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
| Type | IETF Last Call Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2013-11-27 | |
| Requested | 2013-10-31 | |
| Authors | Randy Bush , Rob Austein , Keyur Patel , Hannes Gredler , Matthias Wählisch | |
| I-D last updated | 2015-10-14 (Latest revision 2013-12-12) | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart IETF Last Call review of -04
by Suresh Krishnan
(diff)
Opsdir IETF Last Call review of -04 by Gunter Van de Velde (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Suresh Krishnan |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | IETF Last Call review on draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2013-12-03 |
review-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04-genart-lc-krishnan-2013-12-03-00
I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html ). Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. Document: draft-ietf-sidr-rpki-rtr-impl-04.txt Reviewer: Suresh Krishnan Review Date: 2013/12/03 IESG Telechat date: 2013/12/05 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational RFC but I do have a few comments that the authors may wish to consider. Minor ===== * Section 4 -> The sequences specified in this section do not map directly onto the sequences mentioned in Section 6 of RFC6810. Not sure why there is a mismatch. -> It is unclear what the following footnote means since the row is concerning S2 and Section 6.2 of RFC6810 is the one that deals with a typical exchange. "1) NO, we always respond as described in 6.3 of [RFC6810]" * Section 5 RFC6810 does talk about IPsec as a transport at a SHOULD level, but it is not at all covered here in the support table. Thanks Suresh