Telechat Review of draft-ietf-sidrops-rfc6482bis-07
review-ietf-sidrops-rfc6482bis-07-intdir-telechat-song-2023-11-01-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-sidrops-rfc6482bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | Internet Area Directorate (intdir) | |
| Deadline | 2023-11-23 | |
| Requested | 2023-10-30 | |
| Requested by | Éric Vyncke | |
| Authors | Job Snijders , Ben Maddison , Matt Lepinski , Derrick Kong , Stephen Kent | |
| I-D last updated | 2024-05-23 (Latest revision 2023-12-14) | |
| Completed reviews |
Artart IETF Last Call review of -07
by Jim Fenton
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -07 by Vijay K. Gurbani (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -07 by Haoyu Song (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Haoyu Song |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-sidrops-rfc6482bis by Internet Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/int-dir/LUI_7e811RzLmr3WqXSPmkTP8Wk | |
| Reviewed revision | 07 (document currently at 09) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2023-11-01 |
review-ietf-sidrops-rfc6482bis-07-intdir-telechat-song-2023-11-01-00
I am the assigned INTDIR reviewer for this draft. Please treat the comments just like any other last call comments. I compared this document to RFC6482 and checked the difference. The document is well-written and the updates are clear and meaningful. Nit: addr The first IP address of the IP prefix appearing in the ROAIPAddress address field, as a 32-bit (IPv4) or 128-bit (IPv6) integer value.