Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

Request Review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 08)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-11-27
Requested 2016-10-27
Authors Ram R , Parthasarathi Ravindran , Paul Kyzivat
I-D last updated 2016-12-01
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -07 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -07 by Derek Atkins (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -07 by Carlos Pignataro (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dan Romascanu
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-siprec-callflows by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 07 (document currently at 08)
Result Ready w/nits
Completed 2016-12-01
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area
Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed
by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your
document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft.

For more information, please see the FAQ at




Reviewer: Dan Romascanu
Review Date: 11/25/16
IETF LC End Date: 11/27/16
IESG Telechat date: (if known) 12/2/16

Summary: Ready.

This is a very useful supporting document in the SIPREC cluster.

Major issues:


Minor issues:


Nits/editorial comments:

1. The title is slightly misleading, as the document does not have as goal
to document all or the most important call flows, but rather to provide a
grouping of significant examples. 'Examples of SUP Recording Call Flows'
may have been a better title.

2. As the document uses terminology defined in [RFC7865] and [RFC6341],
listing these two RFCs as Normative References seems necessary (can't
understand the terms without reading the two RFCs)

3. typo in the Securoty Considerations section: '

Security considerations mentioned in [RFC7865] and [RFC7866] has to be
followed ...

s/has to/have to/