Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-19
review-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-19-genart-lc-brim-2014-02-10-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 21)
Type Last Call Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2014-02-18
Requested 2014-02-06
Authors David Borman , Robert T. Braden , Van Jacobson , Richard Scheffenegger
I-D last updated 2014-02-10
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -19 by Scott W. Brim (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -20 by Scott W. Brim (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -19 by Kathleen Moriarty (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -19 by Fred Baker (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Scott W. Brim
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned
Reviewed revision 19 (document currently at 21)
Result Ready w/issues
Completed 2014-02-10
review-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-19-genart-lc-brim-2014-02-10-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on
Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at

<

http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
you may receive.

Document: draft-ietf-tcpm-1323bis-19
Reviewer: Scott Brim
Review Date: 2014-02-10
IETF LC End Date: 2014-02-18
IESG Telechat date: not yet

Summary: Ready with a minor issue

Major issues: none

Minor issues:

> For brevity, the full discussions of the merits and history behind
> the TCP options defined within this document have been omitted.
> [RFC1323] should be consulted for reference.

  The reader is referred to RFC 1323 for background information
  (basically an informative reference) ... but if this draft obsoletes
  RFC 1323, can it refer the reader to it?

Nits/editorial comments: none


Thanks ... Scott