Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-24
review-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-24-opsdir-lc-banks-2021-08-02-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 28) | |
| Type | Last Call Review | |
| Team | Ops Directorate (opsdir) | |
| Deadline | 2021-08-02 | |
| Requested | 2021-07-12 | |
| Authors | Wesley Eddy | |
| Draft last updated | 2021-08-02 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -24
by
Francis Dupont
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -24 by Sarah Banks (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -24 by Kyle Rose (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -25 by Kyle Rose (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -25 by Bernie Volz (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Sarah Banks |
| State | Completed Snapshot | |
| Review |
review-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-24-opsdir-lc-banks-2021-08-02
|
|
| Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ops-dir/ignf9gQiOY3_s4KDL_aghZiKN_g | |
| Reviewed revision | 24 (document currently at 28) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2021-08-02 |
review-ietf-tcpm-rfc793bis-24-opsdir-lc-banks-2021-08-02-00
I’ve reviewed the draft and have no concerns or changes to raise. Since the draft is replacing RFC 793 and chunks of other documents I found this a bit awkward, but no more awkward than the spaghetti soup that is TCP across any number of drafts today, anyhow. Nits is taking forever to run; I’d encourage the authors to ensure nits is clean. Otherwise, the draft is good to go. Thanks, Sarah