Telechat Review of draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-03
review-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-03-genart-telechat-halpern-2018-04-26-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 04) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2018-05-08 | |
| Requested | 2018-04-06 | |
| Authors | Harish Sitaraman , Vishnu Pavan Beeram , Ina Minei , Siva Sivabalan | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-04-26 | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Last Call review of -01
by Manav Bhatia
(diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -02 by Al Morton (diff) Genart Last Call review of -02 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -02 by Hilarie Orman (diff) Genart Telechat review of -03 by Joel M. Halpern (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Joel M. Halpern |
| State | Completed Snapshot | |
| Review |
review-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-03-genart-telechat-halpern-2018-04-26
|
|
| Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 04) | |
| Result | Ready with Issues | |
| Completed | 2018-04-26 |
review-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-03-genart-telechat-halpern-2018-04-26-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-teas-sr-rsvp-coexistence-rec-03 Reviewer: Joel Halpern Review Date: 2018-04-26 IETF LC End Date: 2018-04-20 IESG Telechat date: 2018-05-10 Summary: This document is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard Major issues: N/A Minor issues: As noted in my email response to this document revision, the authors have responded to my earlier comments. While I think there are significant regards in which the document should be clearer, and would be helped by such increased clarity, it is technically correct and publishable as is. Nits/editorial comments: N/A