Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead-04
review-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead-04-genart-telechat-romascanu-2017-05-19-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 05) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
Deadline | 2017-05-23 | |
Requested | 2017-05-05 | |
Authors | John Preuß Mattsson , Daniel Migault | |
I-D last updated | 2017-05-19 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -03
by Dan Romascanu
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -03 by Benjamin Kaduk (diff) Genart Telechat review of -04 by Dan Romascanu (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Dan Romascanu |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 04 (document currently at 05) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2017-05-19 |
review-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead-04-genart-telechat-romascanu-2017-05-19-00
I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for direction from your document shepherd or AD before posting a new version of the draft. For more information, please see the FAQ at <https://trac.ietf.org/trac/gen/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Document: draft-ietf-tls-ecdhe-psk-aead-?? Reviewer: Dan Romascanu Review Date: 2017-05-19 IETF LC End Date: 2017-05-18 IESG Telechat date: 2017-05-25 Summary: This is a straight-forward and clear document that defines several new cipher suites for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocol version 1.2 and higher, based on the Ephemeral Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellman with Pre-Shared Key (ECDHE_PSK) key exchange together with the Authenticated Encryption with Associated Data (AEAD) algorithms AES-GCM and AES-CCM. The document is well written and I appreciate the effort to clarify in the Introduction the context, what was missing, and why the document is necessary. One issue raised in my initial review for draft-03 was addressed, discussed and draft-04 includes useful clarification text. The document is Ready Major issues: Minor issues: Nits/editorial comments: