Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tls-falsestart-01
review-ietf-tls-falsestart-01-opsdir-lc-baker-2016-05-09-00

I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments
were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of the IETF
drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included in AD
reviews during the IESG review. Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

I claim no expertise in the internals of TLS, and am not reviewing this from
the perspective of correctness in action. I frankly hope that the working group
did that for itself. I am looking at this for operational impact - would an
operator/network administrator of a client host using this procedure, or the
operator of a network carrying its traffic, observe or have to deal with a
difference in behavior?

My view: this is good to go. Apart from possibly needing to turn it on, I see
no interaction an operator would need to be involved with or notice.

Attachment:

signature.asc

Description:

 Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail