Early Review of draft-ietf-trill-centralized-replication-03
review-ietf-trill-centralized-replication-03-rtgdir-early-patel-2016-05-20-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-trill-centralized-replication |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 13) | |
| Type | Early Review | |
| Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
| Deadline | 2016-05-20 | |
| Requested | 2016-04-16 | |
| Authors | Hao Weiguo , Yizhou Li , Muhammad Durrani , Sujay Gupta , Andrew Qu | |
| I-D last updated | 2018-04-12 (Latest revision 2018-01-25) | |
| Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -03
by Keyur Patel
(diff)
Genart IETF Last Call review of -10 by Francis Dupont (diff) Secdir IETF Last Call review of -10 by Joseph A. Salowey (diff) Genart Telechat review of -12 by Francis Dupont (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Keyur Patel |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Early review on draft-ietf-trill-centralized-replication by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 03 (document currently at 13) | |
| Result | Has nits | |
| Completed | 2016-05-20 |
review-ietf-trill-centralized-replication-03-rtgdir-early-patel-2016-05-20-00
Hello, I have been selected as the Routing Directorate reviewer for this draft. The Routing Directorate seeks to review all routing or routing-related drafts as they pass through IETF last call and IESG review, and sometimes on special request. The purpose of the review is to provide assistance to the Routing ADs. For more information about the Routing Directorate, please see http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/rtg/trac/wiki/RtgDir . Although these comments are primarily for the use of the Routing ADs, it would be helpful if you could consider them along with any other IETF Last Call comments that you receive, and strive to resolve them through discussion or by updating the draft. Document: draft-ietf-trill-centralized-replication-05 Reviewer: Keyur Patel Review Date: 27-Apr-2016 Intended Status: Standards Track Summary: The document is well written and seems ready for the publication. No major issues found. Minor nits are listed below. Major Issues: None. Minor Issues Intended Status: "Standards Track" Please. Section 1, 3 paragraph: S/will be described/is described. Section 11.1, Do you need to define any error conditions where multiple flag bits are set? Regards, Keyur