Early Review of draft-ietf-trill-resilient-trees-08
review-ietf-trill-resilient-trees-08-rtgdir-early-andersson-2018-01-14-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-trill-resilient-trees |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Early Review | |
Team | Routing Area Directorate (rtgdir) | |
Deadline | 2018-01-05 | |
Requested | 2017-12-18 | |
Requested by | Alia Atlas | |
Authors | Mingui Zhang , Tissa Senevirathne , Janardhanan Pathangi , Ayan Banerjee , Anoop Ghanwani | |
I-D last updated | 2018-01-14 | |
Completed reviews |
Rtgdir Early review of -05 by Loa Andersson
(diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -08 by Loa Andersson (diff) |
|
Comments |
Someone with experience for multicast and resiliency would be preferred. Stewart Bryant and Ice are both likely candidates - but others are possible. |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Loa Andersson |
State | Completed | |
Request | Early review on draft-ietf-trill-resilient-trees by Routing Area Directorate Assigned | |
Reviewed revision | 08 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Has nits | |
Completed | 2018-01-14 |
review-ietf-trill-resilient-trees-08-rtgdir-early-andersson-2018-01-14-00
Hello I have been selected to do a routing directorate “early” review of this draft. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-trill-resilient-trees/ The routing directorate will, on request from the working group chair, perform an “early” review of a draft before it is submitted for publication to the IESG. The early review can be performed at any time during the draft’s lifetime as a working group document. The purpose of the early review depends on the stage that the document has reached. Document: draft-ietf-trill-resilient-trees-08.txt Reviewer: Loa Andersson Review Date: 2018-01-15 Intended Status: Proposed Standard Summary: Choose from this list... This document is basically ready for publication, but has very small nits that should be considered prior to being submitted to the IESG. Comments: I did an early review for the working group on version -05. What I've done this time is: - checked that my earlier comments been satisfactorily address (they have) - re-read the document, and only found very small nits Nits: The nits are only that abbreviations (e.g. DT) needs to be expanded the first time they occur in the document. Caveat: I agree with ALia that someone with more experience from p2mp protocols than I have should take a look at the document. YOu should also check the miscellaneous warnings from the nits tool. /Loa -- Loa Andersson email: loa@pi.nu Senior MPLS Expert Huawei Technologies (consultant) phone: +46 739 81 21 64