Skip to main content

Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-13
review-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-13-genart-telechat-even-2016-04-07-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 15)
Type Telechat Review
Team General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart)
Deadline 2016-03-15
Requested 2016-03-01
Authors Gorry Fairhurst
Draft last updated 2016-04-07
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -11 by Roni Even (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -13 by Roni Even (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Benjamin Kaduk (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Opsdir Telechat review of -13 by Linda Dunbar (diff)
Rtgdir Early review of -11 by Andrew G. Malis (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Roni Even
State Completed
Review review-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-13-genart-telechat-even-2016-04-07
Reviewed revision 13 (document currently at 15)
Result Ready
Completed 2016-04-07
review-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-13-genart-telechat-even-2016-04-07-00
Hi David,

This will be good.

Thanks

Roni



From:

 Black, David [mailto:david.black at emc.com]

Sent:

 Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:26 PM

To:

 Roni Even; draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all at tools.ietf.org

Cc:

 ietf at ietf.org; gen-art at ietf.org

Subject:

 RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11



Hi Roni,

Looks like this was missed - sorry for the absence of a response.

WRT section 6.3.2 (now section 5.3.2) “persistently fails to deliver acceptable
TDM service” is discussed in significant detail in Appendix A of the referenced
[ID-ietf-pals-congcons] - it turns out to be a much longer discussion by
comparison to section 6.3.1 (now section 5.3.1) that involves references to
ITU-T G.826 and G.875.  I’d prefer not to reproduce or try to summarize that
discussion in the tsvwg-circuit-breaker draft, but a sentence could be added to
the end of that section to point the reader in the right direction, e.g.: “See
Appendix A of [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] for further discussion.”

Thanks, --David



From:

 Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv at gmail.com]

Sent:

 Monday, February 08, 2016 1:43 PM

To:

 draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all at tools.ietf.org

Cc:

 ietf at ietf.org; gen-art at ietf.org

Subject:

 Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11



I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART,
please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>.

Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may
receive.

Document:

draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11

Reviewer: Roni Even

Review Date:2016–2-8

IETF LC End Date: 2016–2-9

IESG Telechat date:



Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a BCP RFC.







Major issues:





Minor issues:



In section 6.3.2 the proposal is “For that reason, the draft suggests that a
managed circuit breaker that shuts down a PW when it persistently fails to
deliver acceptable TDM service is a useful means for addressing these
congestion concerns.” I accepted to see some definition of “persistently fails”
at least similar to section 6.3.1.





Nits/editorial comments: