Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-13
review-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-13-genart-telechat-even-2016-04-07-00
| Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker |
|---|---|---|
| Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 15) | |
| Type | Telechat Review | |
| Team | General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) (genart) | |
| Deadline | 2016-03-15 | |
| Requested | 2016-03-01 | |
| Authors | Gorry Fairhurst | |
| I-D last updated | 2016-04-07 | |
| Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -11
by Roni Even
(diff)
Genart Telechat review of -13 by Roni Even (diff) Secdir Last Call review of -11 by Benjamin Kaduk (diff) Opsdir Last Call review of -11 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Opsdir Telechat review of -13 by Linda Dunbar (diff) Rtgdir Early review of -11 by Andrew G. Malis (diff) |
|
| Assignment | Reviewer | Roni Even |
| State | Completed | |
| Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker by General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) Assigned | |
| Reviewed revision | 13 (document currently at 15) | |
| Result | Ready | |
| Completed | 2016-04-07 |
review-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-13-genart-telechat-even-2016-04-07-00
Hi David, This will be good. Thanks Roni From: Black, David [mailto:david.black at emc.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 5:26 PM To: Roni Even; draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all at tools.ietf.org Cc: ietf at ietf.org; gen-art at ietf.org Subject: RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11 Hi Roni, Looks like this was missed - sorry for the absence of a response. WRT section 6.3.2 (now section 5.3.2) “persistently fails to deliver acceptable TDM service” is discussed in significant detail in Appendix A of the referenced [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] - it turns out to be a much longer discussion by comparison to section 6.3.1 (now section 5.3.1) that involves references to ITU-T G.826 and G.875. I’d prefer not to reproduce or try to summarize that discussion in the tsvwg-circuit-breaker draft, but a sentence could be added to the end of that section to point the reader in the right direction, e.g.: “See Appendix A of [ID-ietf-pals-congcons] for further discussion.” Thanks, --David From: Roni Even [mailto:ron.even.tlv at gmail.com] Sent: Monday, February 08, 2016 1:43 PM To: draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker.all at tools.ietf.org Cc: ietf at ietf.org; gen-art at ietf.org Subject: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11 I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at <http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq>. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-ietf-tsvwg-circuit-breaker-11 Reviewer: Roni Even Review Date:2016–2-8 IETF LC End Date: 2016–2-9 IESG Telechat date: Summary: This draft is almost ready for publication as a BCP RFC. Major issues: Minor issues: In section 6.3.2 the proposal is “For that reason, the draft suggests that a managed circuit breaker that shuts down a PW when it persistently fails to deliver acceptable TDM service is a useful means for addressing these congestion concerns.” I accepted to see some definition of “persistently fails” at least similar to section 6.3.1. Nits/editorial comments: