Skip to main content

Last Call Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06
review-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06-secdir-lc-harkins-2015-02-05-00

Request Review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use
Requested revision No specific revision (document currently at 11)
Type Last Call Review
Team Security Area Directorate (secdir)
Deadline 2015-02-17
Requested 2014-12-11
Authors Dr. Joseph D. Touch
I-D last updated 2015-02-05
Completed reviews Genart Last Call review of -06 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Genart Telechat review of -07 by Dan Romascanu (diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -06 by Dan Harkins (diff)
Opsdir Last Call review of -06 by Tim Wicinski (diff)
Assignment Reviewer Dan Harkins
State Completed
Request Last Call review on draft-ietf-tsvwg-port-use by Security Area Directorate Assigned
Reviewed revision 06 (document currently at 11)
Result Has nits
Completed 2015-02-05
review-ietf-tsvwg-port-use-06-secdir-lc-harkins-2015-02-05-00
  Hello,

  I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's
ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the
IESG.  These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the
security area directors.  Document editors and WG chairs should treat
these comments just like any other last call comments.

  This draft provides some advice and recommendations on protocol
port use to application and service designers. It has a nice, brief
history of port usage and a nice list of guiding principles to help
conserve port space. It will make a nice BCP. In my opinion it is Ready
For Publication. With that said, I do have a small comment. In section
7.4 the draft says that TLS should be used to protect services that do
not provide their own security directly. It might be worth while adding
mention of DTLS and IPsec. And if the latter is not something that
should be recommended then justification for that stance should be
given.

  regards,

  Dan.