Telechat Review of draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases-05
review-ietf-tvr-use-cases-05-secdir-telechat-turner-2024-02-23-00
Request | Review of | draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases |
---|---|---|
Requested revision | No specific revision (document currently at 09) | |
Type | Telechat Review | |
Team | Security Area Directorate (secdir) | |
Deadline | 2024-02-27 | |
Requested | 2024-02-15 | |
Authors | Edward J. Birrane , Nicolas Kuhn , Yingzhen Qu , Rick Taylor , Li Zhang | |
I-D last updated | 2024-02-23 | |
Completed reviews |
Genart Last Call review of -04
by Behcet Sarikaya
(diff)
Secdir Last Call review of -04 by Sean Turner (diff) Tsvart Last Call review of -04 by Michael Scharf (diff) Intdir Telechat review of -05 by Pascal Thubert (diff) Iotdir Telechat review of -07 by Charles E. Perkins (diff) Secdir Telechat review of -05 by Sean Turner (diff) |
|
Assignment | Reviewer | Sean Turner |
State | Completed | |
Request | Telechat review on draft-ietf-tvr-use-cases by Security Area Directorate Assigned | |
Posted at | https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/secdir/23ShWkOPAAvnPfcLycKAfdgkNBM | |
Reviewed revision | 05 (document currently at 09) | |
Result | Ready | |
Completed | 2024-02-23 |
review-ietf-tvr-use-cases-05-secdir-telechat-turner-2024-02-23-00
Hi! This is my second review of this I-D; I compared -04 to -05. I had two points: 1. Thanks for a greatly improved security considerations section. While it is still essentially empty, now readers will know why! ;) Changing my review to "Ready" based on the changes to the security considerations. 2. I am going to infer from the changes made in s5.3 (dropping the intro sentence and adding the sentence about the ground station) means that mobile satellites are not a non-deterministic scenario. But, it would be nice to confirm this. Cheers, spt